Correspondent Banking
Reviews respondent relationships, nested activity, and payment flows. Builds the periodic review file and evidences the risk position on the relationship.
BUILT BY PRACTITIONERS
One platform designed to handle highly complex to most
simplistic financial crime compliance use cases.
RiskPulse agents extract facts, not opinions. Every task they run is governed by your policy, and every conclusion is placed in front of the analyst before it counts.Investigation-driven by design
What RiskPulse investigates
Financial crime work is not one job. A sanctions hit takes minutes; a trade finance case takes a specialist a fortnight. RiskPulse handles both because the underlying method — plan the file, gather the evidence, report the finding — does not change with the difficulty.
Reviews respondent relationships, nested activity, and payment flows. Builds the periodic review file and evidences the risk position on the relationship.
Reads trade documents, tests pricing against benchmarks, checks vessel and route consistency, and screens every counterparty in the chain.
Collects transactional and behavioural data, traces the flow of funds across accounts, and produces an investigator-ready case file with the narrative drafted.
Dispositions sanctions, PEP, and adverse media alerts with a reasoned rationale for each — semantic matching rather than fuzzy-string guesswork.
Handles the fund, SMA, LP, and SPV structures behind a single mandate — each entity, domicile, and product scope treated as its own file.
Verifies documents, maps ownership to the ultimate beneficial owner, scores risk against your policy, and runs the enhanced due diligence depth your CDD model requires.
How it works · agentic architecture
Each case runs through three coordinated agents, and each answers for its own work. A reviewer can interrogate the plan, the evidence, and the conclusion independently — accept, amend, or reject each without disturbing the rest.
Categorises the case, maps the structure, determines the applicable regimes, and generates the complete task list — before a person reads a page.
Executes the plan — sourcing external data, validating documents, extracting fields with a citation to the source page, and resolving entities against registries and lists.
Assembles the findings, drafts the narrative in your templates and house style, and attaches the supporting evidence as an examiner-ready package.
The platform records what was asked, what was executed, what evidence was found, and who approved it. The result is a complete case record — one an examiner can follow without needing the person who built it.
See the platform in detailWhy RiskPulse
Compliance teams do not need an assistant that is confidently wrong. They need a system that follows their policy, shows its work, and hands the judgment back at the right moment.
Your onboarding domains, client categories, risk appetite, CDD and EDD depth, checklists, and narrative templates drive every step. The agents execute your policy — they do not bring their own.
Analysts and managers validate, override, and approve at every gate. Nothing is filed on the platform's own authority, and every intervention is recorded as part of the audit trail.
Formed in 2025 by people who ran risk, compliance, and investigation programmes at global banks and Big-4 firms — and backed by Global Economics Group.
Who we serve
RiskPulse deploys inside your own cloud, alongside the case management and screening estate you already run. It is an overlay, not a replacement.
Enterprise-grade compliance across many jurisdictions, entity types, and product lines.
The same regulatory expectations with a fraction of the headcount.
One mandate arriving as dozens of funds, SMAs, LPs, and SPVs across domiciles.
High-velocity businesses where alert volume outpaces the team by an order of magnitude.
High-frequency, cross-border, low-value flows requiring defensible disposition at volume.
Firms serving multiple clients across different jurisdictions and regulatory environments.
Articles
Short, applied writing from investigation and compliance practitioners on what actually slows case resolution, where automation helps, and where analyst judgment remains non-negotiable.
A practical checklist for building defensible AI-supported investigations: traceability, reviewer controls, evidence citations, and exception handling.
Breaking down institutional onboarding effort and how teams can reduce turnaround by automating document assembly while keeping adjudication fully human-controlled.
A framework for assigning reviewer authority across plan, evidence, and narrative so teams can challenge outputs without restarting the whole case.
Talk to the team
Pick a real onboarding file or a closed investigation and see how RiskPulse plans it, evidences it, and writes it up under your policy.
Request a Demo