Full reasoning chain
Every conclusion carries its reasoning and a citation to the source document, with agent actions and human overrides recorded in sequence.
Solution · AML Investigations
Every alert answered, with a reason.
Monitoring alerts dispositioned with a written rationale, cases investigated end to end, and regulatory narratives drafted for review. Where alert volume outpaces the team by an order of magnitude, this is the work that consumes the team.
ScopeEvidenceFinding
The work
What the file
actually takes.
RiskPulse does not replace your transaction monitoring system. It takes what that system raises and investigates from there, returning the outcome to the case system your team already works in.
01
Alert
The alert arrives from your monitoring system with its scenario, parties and transactions.
02
Triage
The case is scoped, related alerts identified, and cross-alert overlap assessed so one entity is investigated once.
03
Investigation
Parties screened, flows traced, business context established, and patterns tested against typology.
04
Disposition
Each dimension scored, the composite determined, and the outcome reasoned against your policy.
05
Reporting
Where a filing is warranted, the narrative is drafted in your template for a person to review and submit.
Where the agents run
Plan. Examine. Report.
The same three agents run this case type as run every other. What differs is the policy behind them — the plan template, the dimensions scored, the tools available, and the report that comes out.
Cross-alert analysis, so one entity is one case.
Alerts arrive independently but activity does not. When several alerts share an entity and overlapping transactions, RiskPulse establishes that they are one story rather than several — additive for monitoring priority, but not multiplicative for risk. It is the difference between investigating a customer once and investigating them four times.
- Written rationale per alert — every disposition reasoned, not closed on a code
- Typology testing — patterns assessed against structuring, layering and placement indicators, and the absence of them recorded
- Retail and payment fraud — merchant, chargeback and account-level fraud investigated on the same engine under its own policy
- Narrative drafting — regulatory reports drafted in your format, for a person to validate and file
Product screenshotCase record
Placeholder — case record
Policy for this case type
Configured,
not hardcoded.
Nothing on this page is fixed in the product. Every element below is a policy setting you define, which is why the same platform runs this case type and the four others.
- Domain
- Correspondent, commercial, retail or payments — each with its own categories and policy.
- Risk dimensions
- Party, transaction, jurisdiction, business context and alert risk for money laundering; merchant, control, collusion and documentation risk for fraud.
- Override rules
- The conditions that force an outcome regardless of the weighted score — defined by you, applied consistently.
- Review gates
- Configurable by scenario and score band; low-risk dispositions can run to sign-off, escalations cannot.
Controls
Defensible
after the fact.
The same governance and quality controls apply to this case type as to every other — because an examiner does not lower the standard for the harder files.
Quality control
Sampling built in
A sampling methodology sits behind this case type, so your quality team can assess a representative sample rather than reviewing at random.
Quality assurance
Independent assessment
A separate set of agents assesses case quality end to end against your methodology — a second opinion on the work.
See it on your own file
Bring a case.
We will run it.
Pick a real file or a closed case and see how RiskPulse plans it, evidences it, and writes it up under your policy.
Request a Demo