Full reasoning chain
Every conclusion carries its reasoning and a citation to the source document, with agent actions and human overrides recorded in sequence.
Solution · Corporate Fraud
The cases that arrive without an alert.
Misappropriation of funds, internal matters, and whistleblower referrals. No system raises these — they arrive from an audit finding, a report, or a manager who noticed something. The scoping is the hard part, and it is where most investigations go wrong.
ScopeEvidenceFinding
The work
What the file
actually takes.
A misappropriation case is a worked example: the allegation is narrow, the document population is enormous, and the finding has to survive both an internal committee and, potentially, a court.
01
Referral
The allegation is scoped — who, what period, which systems and which records are in scope.
02
Collection
Relevant documents, invoices, approvals, communications and system records are gathered and indexed.
03
Analysis
Transactions traced, approval chains reconstructed, and control failures identified against where they should have caught it.
04
Corroboration
Findings tested against independent records, and interview support prepared where the matter requires it.
05
Findings
The determination, the evidence behind each finding, and the actions your policy mandates.
Where the agents run
Plan. Examine. Report.
The same three agents run this case type as run every other. What differs is the policy behind them — the plan template, the dimensions scored, the tools available, and the report that comes out.
Prepared for the conversation, not just the file.
A corporate fraud matter usually reaches a point where someone has to be interviewed. RiskPulse prepares that ground: the document population indexed and searchable, the approval chain reconstructed, the discrepancies identified, and interview scripts drafted against what the evidence actually shows — so the interview tests a hypothesis rather than fishes for one.
- Interview scripts — drafted from the evidence, with the supporting document attached to each line of questioning
- Document and invoice review — large populations read, indexed and tested for duplication, alteration and approval gaps
- Control failure mapping — where the process should have caught it, and why it did not
- Referral pack — findings ranked by severity with the mandated actions stated
Product screenshotCase record
Placeholder — case record
Policy for this case type
Configured,
not hardcoded.
Nothing on this page is fixed in the product. Every element below is a policy setting you define, which is why the same platform runs this case type and the four others.
- Domain
- Corporate investigations — with its own matter types, from misappropriation to conflict of interest.
- Risk dimensions
- Defined per matter type; a misappropriation case scores differently from a procurement or expense matter.
- Plan template
- Matter type drives the scoping questions, the document population and the analysis that must run.
- Report template
- Your investigation report format, including the findings ranking and the actions your policy mandates.
Controls
Defensible
after the fact.
The same governance and quality controls apply to this case type as to every other — because an examiner does not lower the standard for the harder files.
Quality control
Sampling built in
A sampling methodology sits behind this case type, so your quality team can assess a representative sample rather than reviewing at random.
Quality assurance
Independent assessment
A separate set of agents assesses case quality end to end against your methodology — a second opinion on the work.
See it on your own file
Bring a case.
We will run it.
Pick a real file or a closed case and see how RiskPulse plans it, evidences it, and writes it up under your policy.
Request a Demo